<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="Kukkaisvoima version 9" -->
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<atom:link href="http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi/feed" rel="self" />
<title>Nick Coleman</title>
<link>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi</link>
<description>Nick Coleman blog</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 10:21:00 -0700</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 10:21:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://23.fi/kukkaisvoima/</generator>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Australia's Fiscal and Monetary Policies: How They Work
</title>
<link>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=fiscal-policy%21201205191021%21economics%2Cpolitics</link>
<comments>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=fiscal-policy%21201205191021%21economics%2Cpolitics#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 10:21:00 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
<category>economics</category>
<category>politics</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=fiscal-policy%21201205191021%21economics%2Cpolitics/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ 
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>
The <i>Sydney Morning Herald</i>'s Ross Gittins <a
href="http://www.nickcoleman.org/axs/ax.pl?http://www.theage.com.au/business/situation-normal-time-to-put-fiscal-policies-away-20120518-1yw74.html"
title="SMH Ross Gittins Article">has a good article</a> on how monetary policy and
fiscal policy as implemented by Australia's Reserve Bank and the Dept of Treasury
interact over both short and medium terms to produce low inflation and good economic
growth.
<p>
Australia has seen both for a few decades, much of it built on the foundations of
Treasurer Paul Keating in the 1980s.
<p>
The article, which is pretty much a summary of key points made by Secretary of
Treasury Dr Martin Parkinson in his annual post-Budget speech, gives a good overall view
and is worth a read for a layman's summary of how it all works.
<p>
In a nutshell, Australia's fiscal policy includes automatic stabilisers that offset
periods of low or high growth, and monetary policy includes the ability to change things
in the immediate short term with adjustments that can be small or large if needed.
<p>
Both of these things combined have provided stability and continued growth with low inflation.
<p>
The key point to understanding what we want is that, "while keeping inflation low may be
the <i>target</i> [Ed: and is what the press so often focusses on], the <i>goal</i> is non-inflationary growth&mdash;growth that should keep unemployment low."
<p>
The result is a sustained period, over 20 years, of low inflationary growth that is the
envy of the rest of the world.  We have avoided the worst of the busts and have (relatively) few
negatives from the booms.  This is why you so often see Australia's Treasurer at the
time voted as world's best treasurer by <i>Euromoney</i> magazine and others.
<p>
A robust Treasury and an independent central bank have played important key roles, but we should
also give credit to both sides of politics for keeping to the game plan in their successive
budgets.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=fiscal-policy%21201205191021%21economics%2Cpolitics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Casey Stoner Retiring
</title>
<link>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=stoner-retiring%21201205180948%21sport</link>
<comments>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=stoner-retiring%21201205180948%21sport#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 09:48:00 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
<category>sport</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=stoner-retiring%21201205180948%21sport/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ 
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>
Casey Stoner <a
href="http://www.nickcoleman.org/axs/ax.pl?http://www.redbull.com/cs/Satellite/en_INT/Article/motogp-stoner-retires-021243210443801"
title="Red Bull article">has announced</a> he will be retiring from MotoGP at the end of this
season.
<p>
Wow, colour me surprised.  It seems like only yesterday when he burst onto the scene and
started to provide some real competition to Valentino Rossi.  Then Jorge Lorenzo came
along and we had some great seasons with three highly talented riders competing and
providing some great racing.
<p>
Thanks for some great memories and good luck with your future endeavours, Casey.
<p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=stoner-retiring%21201205180948%21sport/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Escaping Single Quotes in Bash
</title>
<link>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=bash-escaping-quotes%21201205141652%21unix</link>
<comments>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=bash-escaping-quotes%21201205141652%21unix#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 16:52:00 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
<category>unix</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=bash-escaping-quotes%21201205141652%21unix/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ 
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>
A quick note to myself because I always am forgetting this stuff.
<p>
You know that Bash will expand anything within double quotes, and nothing within single
quotes.  How do you include a single quote within single quotes?
<p>
This comes up more often than you would think.  I often write a git commit
message with a possessive apostrophe, such as:    
<div class="code">Update my website's index page</div>
using single quotes because I don't want bash expanding anything.
<p>
Many times I want to commit using the command line without dropping into the editor to
write the commit message.  How do I include the apostrophe within single quotes? 
<p>
The answer is that you break the string into <strong>two</strong> strings separated with an escaped single
quote, like this:   
<div class="code">git commit -a -m 'Update my website'\''s index page'</div>
<p>
Notice the two strings with an escaped single quote between them. Bash will pass the
strings unmodified to git which will store them as one single string:	
<div class="code">Update my website's index page</div>
<p>
[ Why do I keep forgetting this?  It is because, for some reason, I keep thinking a
succession of single quotes will magically resolve into the correct escaped quote, and,
when it doesn't work, I think I have the wrong number of successive quotes, so I go back
and try again... Etc.
<p>
Probably a hangover from early Basic on the Amiga or perhaps some forgotten C editor's
quirk. ]
<p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=bash-escaping-quotes%21201205141652%21unix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>I Moved From Google-chrome To Firefox
</title>
<link>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=googlechrome-to-firefox%21201205101149%21general%2Cinternet</link>
<comments>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=googlechrome-to-firefox%21201205101149%21general%2Cinternet#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 11:49:00 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
<category>general</category>
<category>internet</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=googlechrome-to-firefox%21201205101149%21general%2Cinternet/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ 
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>
Several weeks ago, I changed my default browser from Google-chrome to Firefox.  Here's
why.
<p>
I had been using Google-chrome for over a year and had been a pretty happy user.  I
liked the Google-chrome user interface and Google had clearly put a lot of thought into how a
user interacts with their browser.  Neat touches were everywhere.
<p>
I did have some niggling privacy concerns, after all Google-chrome is created by the biggest
data mining company in the world, but I figured Google had too much to lose by ignoring
privacy in a browser.  That is especially so for a browser whose source code is
available to all.
<p>
Then I discovered that Google-chrome forbids the Ghostery add-on from blocking the
Doubleclick network. Ghostery is a popular add-on that prevents third-party sites from
monitoring your browsing, and Doubleclick is a monitoring and advertising network owned
by Google.
<p>
Apparently, Google has no problem with bending the privacy rules to advantage itself.<a
href="#fn1" id="back1"><sup>1</sup></a>  Time to give Firefox a go.
<p>
I hadn't used Firefox seriously for years and was pleasantly surprised.  It starts
fairly quickly and is not a huge memory pig like Google-chrome.  It is a little plain out of
the box, but some add-ons soon fixed that.
<p>
A few months later, this is what I am running.  For privacy:
<ul>
<li><strong>adblock-plus</strong>, to block ads</li>
<li><strong>ghostery</strong>, to block third-party cookies and scripts</li>
<li><strong>noscript</strong>, to block any javascript</li>
<li><strong>requestpolicy</strong>, to block any third-party reference</li>
<li><strong>refcontrol</strong>, to control the <a href="http://www.nickcoleman.org/axs/ax.pl?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_referer" title="Wikipedia: Referer header"><em>referer header</em></a> so that my browsing history doesn't leak to third parties, and </li>
<li><strong>cookiemonster</strong>, to control cookies.  </li>
</ul>
<p>
Then I wanted to enhance Firefox to give a good user experience like Google-chrome.  These
plugins did the trick:
<ul>
<li><strong>add to searchbar</strong>, add new search engines to the search toolbar</li>
<li><strong>customizable shortcuts</strong>, create your own keystroke shortcuts</li>
<li><strong>duplicate in tab context menu</strong>, duplicate a tab</li>
<li><strong>firegestures</strong>, similar to vimium but light-weight, uses Vim keystrokes to control the browser, </li>
<li><strong>open link in ...</strong>, adds extra options to the right-click context menu, and</li>
<li><strong>sessionmanager</strong>, save and load sessions by name, and keeps a history.</li>
</ul>
<p>
I now have the same facilities in Firefox that I had in Google-chrome, plus it uses about a
third the memory and addresses all my privacy niggles.
<p>
(I've used the exact name of the add-ons above so you can search for them easily.)
<p>
<div class="footnote">
<a href="#back1" id="fn1">[1] </a>I may be attributing malice to something that is
merely a by-product of how Google-chrome handles plug-ins. Google-chrome apparently does not guarantee
the order that various plug-ins see the DOM, which means that other plug-ins may have
applied their magic before Ghostery, thereby removing any Doubleclick references before Ghostery sees
it. Occam's razor probably applies.   <a href="#back1">&#8593;</a>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=googlechrome-to-firefox%21201205101149%21general%2Cinternet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Last Transit of Venus In One Month
</title>
<link>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=venus-transit%21201205071109%21astronomy%2Cscience</link>
<comments>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=venus-transit%21201205071109%21astronomy%2Cscience#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 11:09:00 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
<category>astronomy</category>
<category>science</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=venus-transit%21201205071109%21astronomy%2Cscience/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ 
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>
The last chance to see a <a
href="http://www.nickcoleman.org/axs/ax.pl?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_transit"
title="Wikipedia Transit of Venus">transit of Venus</a> across the face of the Sun is coming up next
month, June 5-6 to be exact.  Transits of Venus occur in pairs and happen roughly every
hundred years.  The last was in 2004 which was the first of this current pair. The next
will be in 2117 so this is the last chance to see one for anyone alive today.
<p>
Venus transits are historically important to Australians because one of the reasons that
Captain Cook was sent to the Pacific was to observe a Venus transit there.  In the
course of the voyage he visited New Zealand and discovered the east coast of Australia
for Western Europeans. 
<p>
I'll post viewing times for east and west coast Australians a little closer to the
actual date.
<p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=venus-transit%21201205071109%21astronomy%2Cscience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>At Redirect Using the <i>Here String</i>
</title>
<link>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=at-redirect%21201204270929%21unix</link>
<comments>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=at-redirect%21201204270929%21unix#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:29:00 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
<category>unix</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=at-redirect%21201204270929%21unix/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ 
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>
This is just a quick note, more for myself than anything.  I <a
href="http://www.nickcoleman.org/axs/ax.pl?http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=sound-atd-slackware%21201204041055%21unix"
title="Blog post on the at daemon and sound">wrote previously</a> about sound problems
when using the <code>at</code> daemon.
<p>
In a footnote, I mentioned that you can use a command like <code>echo "<i>some_command</i>" | at now
+ 5 hours</code> to set up a job without descending into the at shell.
<p>
In later versions of bash (3.0 or greater, I think), you can also use the <a
href="http://www.nickcoleman.org/axs/ax.pl?http://tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/x17700.html"
title="Advanced Bash Scripting Guide"><b>here string</b></a>, a variant of the here
document (i.e. <code>&lt;&lt; EOF</code>). You use it like this: <code>at now + 5 hours &lt;&lt;&lt; '<i>some_command</i>
[<i>parameters</i>]'</code> (or use double quotes if you want word expansion).
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=at-redirect%21201204270929%21unix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Debian super speedy security update
</title>
<link>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=debian-security-update%21201204211159%21unix</link>
<comments>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=debian-security-update%21201204211159%21unix#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 11:59:00 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
<category>unix</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=debian-security-update%21201204211159%21unix/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ 
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>
A couple of days ago, April 19 to be exact, Tavis Ormandy of the Google Security Team 
<a href="http://www.nickcoleman.org/axs/ax.pl?http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2012-April/086585.html"
title="Tavis post showing bug">reported a bug</a> in OpenSSL that could by used to mount an attack.
<p>
Naturally, any bug in OpenSSL is taken seriously by everyone since it is a widely used
implementation of TLS and SSL.
<p>
I heard about it today and immediately logged on to my <span title="Virtual Private
Server" ><u>VPS</u></span>, which runs Debian 6
(squeeze), to run a system update.  It grabbed updated versions of libssl and
openssl.
<p>
That's pretty impressive, just two days to implement and distribute the fixes.
<p>
I previously had switched the VPS from CentOS to Debian and, apart from a small learning
curve on "the Debian way", I am happy.  It is much more set-n-forget, perfect for a VPS.
<p>
Now, if only Slackware was quite so quick.  My home laptop is still waiting for the
updates.  I love Slackware, but c'mon guys, hurry up.
<p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=debian-security-update%21201204211159%21unix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>iiNet Wins High Court Appeal by Movie Studios
</title>
<link>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=iinet-piracy-high-court%21201204200844%21internet%2Claw</link>
<comments>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=iinet-piracy-high-court%21201204200844%21internet%2Claw#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:44:00 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
<category>internet</category>
<category>law</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=iinet-piracy-high-court%21201204200844%21internet%2Claw/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ 
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>
In great news for anyone opposed to the heavy handed actions of the movie industry in
attempting to prevent piracy, the High Court has ruled that iiNet has no direct power to
prevent its users from downloading pirated content.
<p>
The music and movie industry had previously sued iiNet for, in effect, "authorising"
illegal downloads by not preventing its users from doing so.  They lost that case,
appealed, and lost the appeal.  They then appealed to the High Court.  They have lost
that and the matter is closed.
<p>
Until the government changes the law.  Which they will undoubtedly do, since they are
about to sign the <a href="http://www.nickcoleman.org/axs/ax.pl?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Pacific_Strategic_Economic_Partnership" title="Wikipedia TPP">TPP </a> without any public discussion.  The U.S. has previously
bullied trade partners into changing their copyright enforcement laws to favour the U.S.
movie industry.  There is no doubt in my mind that they will do this again in the latest
TPP round.  The fact that the government is super quiet on the TPP makes me think they
already know that they are going to have to sell out Australia's citizens.
<p>
The High Court decision does not mean that an ISP is immune, however.  One part of the Federal Court
appeal's result was that it provided a set process whereby an ISP could be held liable.  The movie industry
lost the appeal because the process they followed did not lead to iiNet's liability.
<p>
Nevertheless, for the moment, we are protected from such silliness as losing our
internet connection or being sued for thousands of dollars because our teenager
downloaded one stupid song (that we hate because everyone knows no-one has
written decent music since the '80s, right?).
<p>
<a
href="http://www.nickcoleman.org/axs/ax.pl?http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/iinet-wins-landmark-copyright-case/story-e6frgakx-1226334090530"
title="The Australian"><i>The Australian</i></a> has a good summary of the decision and
its history.  My previous posts on this topic are <a
href="http://www.nickcoleman.org/axs/ax.pl?http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=iinetandpiracy%21201002050932%21internet%2Claw"
title="iiNet &amp; AFACT Piracy Case">here</a> and especially <a href="http://www.nickcoleman.org/axs/ax.pl?http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=iinetandpiracypt2%21201102250916%21internet%2Claw" title="iiNet &amp; Piracy Pt. 2">here</a>.
<p>
<hr>
<p>
For the record again, my position is the common one: <div class="image"><img
src="http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/images/failedbusinesscleft.jpg" alt="your failed business model is not my
problem" ></div>I don't condone piracy, but the studios have no right to force a third
party to give them my personal details.  Let's not forget the studios are private
corporations.  They are not the police.  If they want my details, a court order will
give it to them.  Of course, the burden of proof then falls on them, a complication they
do not want to deal with despite any concepts of fairness or due process.  
<p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=iinet-piracy-high-court%21201204200844%21internet%2Claw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Audi Buys Ducati
</title>
<link>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=ducati-buyout-audi%21201204190852%21sport</link>
<comments>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=ducati-buyout-audi%21201204190852%21sport#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:52:00 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
<category>sport</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=ducati-buyout-audi%21201204190852%21sport/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ 
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>
Audi has confirmed it will buy Ducati.  The deal appears to be a strategic one for
Volkswagen, which owns Audi.  Volkswagen views itself as a competitor to BMW and this
purchase gives it an upmarket brand in the motorcycle market to act as a direct rival to
BMW's machines.
<p>
I'm in two minds about the deal.  On one hand, Ducati has been owned by investment
funds since 1996, which was the start of the rot in my opinion, where marketing
overruled the Ducati ethos.  My 1997 900SS was the last of the old-style machines and I
consider it more authentic than the boy-racer models in subsequent years.
<p>
On the other hand, it surely is an insignificant purchase for Audi and especially
Volkswagen, so perhaps it is a trophy purchase where Ducati can get back to its true
spirit of producing beautiful Italian esoteric machinery.
<p>
[Disclaimer: inbuilt bias of rabid Ducati owner.]
<p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=ducati-buyout-audi%21201204190852%21sport/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Llamedos
</title>
<link>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=llamedos%21201204091633%21general</link>
<comments>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=llamedos%21201204091633%21general#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 16:33:00 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
<category>general</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=llamedos%21201204091633%21general/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ 
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>
I just realised that Llamedos in <a
href="http://www.nickcoleman.org/axs/ax.pl?http://www.amazon.com/s/192-0488235-2382630?ie=UTF8&tag=mozilla-20&index=blended&link_code=qs&field-keywords=terry%20pratchett&sourceid=Mozilla-search" title="Amazon titles for Terry Pratchett">Terry Pratchett's</a> <a
href="http://www.nickcoleman.org/axs/ax.pl?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discworld" title="Wikipedia on Discworld">Discworld</a> is <i>sod 'em all</i> backwards!
<p>
Pratchett is a funny man.  Too bad I was a <a href="http://www.nickcoleman.org/axs/ax.pl?http://wiki.lspace.org/wiki/Llamedos" >
bit late to the party</a>.
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nickcoleman.org/blog/index.cgi?post=llamedos%21201204091633%21general/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

